Best CS2 Capsules to Buy — Ranked by Trend and Liquidity
A rising price only helps if you can sell again. Every item here is rated on both: where the price has gone over the last week and month, and whether the item actually trades. Momentum sets the rating — liquidity can only pull it down.
Showing 50 of 126 ranked items, re-sorted within the 1,200-item candidate pool.
| # | Item | Verdict | 7d | 30d | Liquidity | Sell in | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  DreamHack 2014 Mirage Package | Weak entry39medium confidencerarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -5.8% | ▲ +346.0% | Illiquid | ~5 months | $1,745 |
| 2 |  Boston 2018 Legends (Holo-Foil) | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +115.9% | ▲ +127.8% | Illiquid | ~6 months | $550 |
| 3 |  Boston 2018 Train Package | Weak entry39144% of the week's move was yesterday · rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +82.1% | ▲ +135.6% | Illiquid | ~7 months | $67 |
| 4 |  Katowice 2019 Cache Package | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +31.8% | ▲ +142.9% | Illiquid | ~5 months | $104 |
| 5 |  Autograph Capsule | Ninjas in Pyjamas | Cologne 2016 | Weak entry3961% of the week's move was yesterday · rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +7.6% | ▲ +176.5% | Illiquid | ~3 months | $32 |
| 6 |  Autograph Capsule | Virtus.Pro | Cologne 2015 | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +120.8% | ▲ +5.4% | Illiquid | ~1 month | $16 |
| 7 |  Atlanta 2017 Train Package | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -0.6% | ▲ +182.3% | Illiquid | ~2 weeks | $58 |
| 8 |  Autograph Capsule | Group B | Cologne 2015 | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +106.3% | ▲ +22.1% | Illiquid | ~7 months | $55 |
| 9 |  DreamHack Cluj-Napoca 2015 Inferno Package | Weak entry39medium confidence108% of the week's move was yesterday · rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +7.8% | ▲ +161.7% | Illiquid | a year+ | $195 |
| 10 |  ESL One Cologne 2015 Cache Package | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +0.8% | ▲ +166.5% | Illiquid | ~2 months | $394 |
| 11 |  Autograph Capsule | Luminosity Gaming | Cluj-Napoca 2015 | Weak entry39medium confidencerarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -7.4% | ▲ +159.7% | Illiquid | ~3 months | $38 |
| 12 |  Autograph Capsule | mousesports | Cologne 2015 | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +61.6% | ▲ +50.0% | Illiquid | ~4 months | $15 |
| 13 |  Austin 2025 Nuke Package | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +8.3% | ▲ +119.3% | Illiquid | ~3 weeks | $6.01 |
| 14 |  ESL One Katowice 2015 Inferno Package | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +3.5% | ▲ +124.1% | Illiquid | ~3 months | $136 |
| 15 |  MLG Columbus 2016 Mirage Package | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +1.1% | ▲ +81.7% | Illiquid | No flow | $107 |
| 16 |  MLG Columbus 2016 Overpass Package | Weak entry39medium confidence99% of the week's move was yesterday · rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +15.8% | ▲ +56.7% | Illiquid | ~6 months | $191 |
| 17 |  London 2018 Minor Challengers (Holo-Foil) | Weak entry39rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +2.7% | ▲ +15.8% | Illiquid | ~9 months | $21 |
| 18 |  MLG Columbus 2016 Inferno Package | Weak entry38medium confidencerarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -8.2% | ▲ +90.7% | Illiquid | ~3 months | $127 |
| 19 |  Autograph Capsule | Astralis | Cologne 2016 | Weak entry38rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +29.3% | ▲ +33.3% | Illiquid | ~1 month | $31 |
| 20 |  Katowice 2019 Inferno Package | Weak entry38rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -5.9% | ▲ +27.8% | Illiquid | ~4 months | $19 |
| 21 |  EMS Katowice 2014 Legends | Weak entry38medium confidencerarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -0.4% | ▲ +7.7% | Illiquid | ~4 months | $26,358 |
| 22 |  Stockholm 2021 Overpass Package | Weak entry38rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -8.9% | ▲ +20.0% | Illiquid | ~1 month | $5.51 |
| 23 |  ESL One Katowice 2015 Overpass Package | Weak entry37rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -0.2% | ▲ +19.0% | Illiquid | ~6 months | $713 |
| 24 |  Autograph Capsule | Team Liquid | MLG Columbus 2016 | Weak entry37rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +12.7% | ▼ -0.4% | Illiquid | ~8 months | $18 |
| 25 |  Katowice 2019 Nuke Package | Weak entry37rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -8.7% | ▲ +31.5% | Illiquid | ~4 months | $19 |
| 26 |  Autograph Capsule | Group D | Cologne 2015 | Weak entry37rarely trades — hard to exit | 0% | ▲ +6.1% | Illiquid | a year+ | $36 |
| 27 |  Boston 2018 Mirage Package | Weak entry37rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -1.3% | ▲ +7.5% | Illiquid | ~3 months | $28 |
| 28 |  ESL One Cologne 2015 Dust II Package | Weak entry37medium confidencerarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -7.2% | ▲ +16.3% | Illiquid | ~4 months | $121 |
| 29 |  London 2018 Nuke Package | Weak entry36rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +16.8% | ▲ +46.6% | Illiquid | ~2 weeks | $35 |
| 30 |  Autograph Capsule | Team Dignitas | Cologne 2016 | Weak entry36medium confidencerarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +8.1% | ▲ +59.7% | Illiquid | ~4 weeks | $58 |
| 31 |  Stockholm 2021 Vertigo Package | Weak entry36rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -10.9% | ▲ +34.5% | Illiquid | ~1 month | $5.42 |
| 32 |  Atlanta 2017 Cache Package | Weak entry36medium confidencerarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +4.0% | ▲ +11.9% | Illiquid | ~11 months | $47 |
| 33 |  Katowice 2019 Overpass Package | Weak entry35rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +18.9% | ▲ +40.5% | Illiquid | ~8 months | $26 |
| 34 |  ESL One Katowice 2015 Mirage Package | Weak entry35medium confidence88% of the week's move was yesterday · rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +0.9% | ▲ +66.3% | Illiquid | No flow | $166 |
| 35 |  Autograph Capsule | Titan | Cluj-Napoca 2015 | Weak entry35rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +8.2% | ▲ +5.1% | Illiquid | ~6 months | $27 |
| 36 |  Autograph Capsule | Flipsid3 Tactics | Cologne 2016 | Weak entry35medium confidencerarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +1.0% | ▲ +15.6% | Illiquid | ~3 months | $29 |
| 37 |  Boston 2018 Overpass Package | Weak entry35rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -0.6% | ▲ +5.3% | Illiquid | ~1 month | $46 |
| 38 |  Autograph Capsule | Fnatic | MLG Columbus 2016 | Weak entry35rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -1.8% | ▲ +6.8% | Illiquid | ~2 weeks | $9.37 |
| 39 |  Autograph Capsule | Team EnVyUs | Cologne 2016 | Weak entry35rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -1.4% | ▲ +6.1% | Illiquid | ~2 months | $26 |
| 40 |  Krakow 2017 Inferno Package | Weak entry34rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -0.8% | ▲ +64.9% | Illiquid | ~6 months | $62 |
| 41 |  London 2018 Dust II Package | Weak entry34260% of the week's move was yesterday · rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +7.5% | ▲ +52.3% | Illiquid | ~2 months | $22 |
| 42 |  Autograph Capsule | OpTic Gaming | Cologne 2016 | Weak entry34rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -7.9% | ▲ +28.8% | Illiquid | ~3 months | $35 |
| 43 |  Austin 2025 Nuke Highlight Package | Weak entry34rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +14.1% | ▼ -4.4% | Illiquid | ~2 weeks | $5.91 |
| 44 |  Autograph Capsule | Luminosity Gaming | MLG Columbus 2016 | Weak entry34rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -4.8% | ▲ +23.6% | Illiquid | ~2 weeks | $14 |
| 45 |  Autograph Capsule | Team EnVyUs | Cologne 2015 | Weak entry34rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +0.3% | ▲ +3.2% | Illiquid | ~2 months | $7.04 |
| 46 |  ESL One Cologne 2014 Cache Package | Weak entry34medium confidencerarely trades — hard to exit | 0% | ▲ +3.5% | Illiquid | No flow | $2,077 |
| 47 |  Autograph Capsule | Counter Logic Gaming | Cluj-Napoca 2015 | Weak entry34rarely trades — hard to exit | 0% | ▲ +3.3% | Illiquid | ~2 months | $11 |
| 48 |  Berlin 2019 Nuke Package | Weak entry33rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +1.9% | ▲ +59.1% | Illiquid | ~3 months | $19 |
| 49 |  Rio 2022 Ancient Package | Weak entry33rarely trades — hard to exit | ▲ +6.1% | ▲ +50.4% | Illiquid | ~2 months | $6.24 |
| 50 |  Antwerp 2022 Ancient Package | Weak entry33rarely trades — hard to exit | ▼ -1.0% | ▲ +17.7% | Illiquid | ~3 weeks | $5.79 |
How these ratings are reached
Momentum sets the rating
The 7-day change in the SteamAnalyst reference price at 60%, plus the 30-day change at 40%. Signed, so a week that contradicts its month damps itself instead of both being reported as good news. Above 8% blended is the top band; below -8% is the bottom one.
Liquidity can only pull it down
Measured from units actually traded over 30 days, not from price or popularity. Thin trading caps how well an item can rate however hard it is climbing, because you cannot realise a gain you cannot exit. Nothing about being easy to sell ever raises a rating — that would make this a volume ranking wearing a buy label.
Falling and illiquid is worse than either
On the way down the rule inverts. A falling price in a deep market is a bad entry you can still walk away from; a falling price with nobody trading is a trap, and it rates below the thing you can leave. The two sides are not mirror images and are not calculated as if they were.
What we leave out
Items with fewer than 20 recorded prices in the window, feeds that have not updated in 7 days, items without the 10 trading days needed to rate liquidity, and anything under $5 where a one-cent tick is a percentage point. Each is us declining to guess, not a judgement on the item.
Band boundaries are currently reasoned rather than fitted to the live distribution — they are an informed judgement about how this market moves, not a measurement of it. See the liquidity board for the trade-flow half on its own, or price trends for the price half.
Measurements, not advice. Nothing here predicts the future, and no indicator anticipates a game update, a tournament or a Steam sale. Never spend more than you can afford to lose.
Frequently asked questions
How do you decide which CS2 skins are best to buy?
Two readings, and neither is allowed to speak alone. The first is momentum: how the SteamAnalyst reference price has moved over the last 7 days, weighted against the last 30 so a one-week jump has to be confirmed by the month before it counts. The second is liquidity: whether the item actually trades, measured from real units changing hands over 30 days. Momentum sets the rating and liquidity can only pull it down — because a skin climbing 20% a week is worth nothing to you if there is no way to sell it again.
Why can an item rising fast still rate badly?
Because you have to be able to get back out. A rising price in a market where almost nothing trades is a number on a screen, not money — you would be buying into something with no buyers behind it. Thin trading caps how well an item can rate no matter how hard it is climbing, and an item that rarely trades at all cannot rate above "Weak entry".
What makes an item one of the worst to buy?
A falling price plus a market you cannot leave. Those two are worse together than either is alone: a falling price in a deep market is just a bad entry, since you can still sell. A falling price with nobody trading is a trap. So on the "worst to buy" list, thin trading pushes an item further down rather than merely capping it — the reverse of how it works on the buy side.
What is momentum and how is it calculated?
The 7-day price change weighted at 60%, plus the 30-day change at 40%. Signed, so the two argue with each other: a week up 10% inside a month down 10% blends to about +2% and lands in Neutral, which is the honest reading of a bounce inside a decline. An item needs roughly 8% blended momentum for the top band and 3% for the second.
Why does a big one-day jump not put an item at the top?
Because a week carried by its last day is a spike, not a trend — and it is the thing a momentum ranking gets wrong most often, sorting yesterday's jump to the top on the morning it is least likely to continue. When more than 50% of the week's move happened in the final day, the item cannot claim the top band and the row says so.
Where do the price changes come from?
The SteamAnalyst reference price — the same aggregate price shown in the price column here and on every skin page. That is deliberate: the percentage this page ranks on is the percentage the price beside it actually moved, and clicking through to the skin shows the same number. Three surfaces, one measurement.
Why is my skin missing from this list?
One of four reasons, and each is us declining to guess rather than a judgement on the item. We hold fewer than 20 recorded prices for it in the window; its price or trade data has not updated in over 7 days; we have not recorded the 10 trading days needed to rate its liquidity at all; or it is under $5, where a one-cent tick is a whole percentage point and the ranking would be measuring rounding rather than the market.
Is this financial advice?
No. It is a measurement of two things — where a price has been, and how readily the item trades — presented so you can see both and disagree with the conclusion. Neither predicts the future. Game updates, tournament demand and Steam sales all move this market in ways no indicator anticipates. Never spend more than you can afford to lose.